Has the CJEU made the first step to put a stop to the criminalisation of migration? : commentary to the judgement in the case of JZ in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

CC BY-NC-ND Logo DOI

The paper presents a critical discussion of the CJEU judgment in the JZ case (C 806/18), in which the Court interpreted Article 11 of Directive 2008/115 that regulates entry ban issuance. The author asks a question of whether an entry ban as a measure limiting the right to free movement has a moral and legal ground in international law and EU law. Moreover, the author focuses on the problem of the criminalisation of irregular migration – both in the context of the established line of the Court’s case law and in the case of a vague national law standard that penalizes illegal stays – the possibility to apply the criminal law concept of error in law and thus exclusion of criminal liability of an illegal migrant.

Tytuł
Has the CJEU made the first step to put a stop to the criminalisation of migration? : commentary to the judgement in the case of JZ in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Twórca
Kosińska Anna Magdalena ORCID 0000-0002-0915-874x
Słowa kluczowe
COVID-19 pandemic; criminalisation of migration; Directive 2008/115; entry ban; irregular migration; return policy
Słowa kluczowe
pandemia COVID-19; kryminalizacja migracji; dyrektywa 2008/115; zakaz wjazdu; nielegalna migracja; polityka powrotów
Data
2021
Typ zasobu
artykuł
Identyfikator zasobu
DOI 10.15290/bsp.2021.26.06.12
Źródło
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2021, vol. 26 nr 6 (special issue), s. 207-224
Język
angielski
Prawa autorskie
CC BY-NC-ND CC BY-NC-ND
Dyscyplina naukowa
Dziedzina nauk społecznych; Nauki prawne
Kategorie
Publikacje pracowników US
Data udostępnienia29 lis 2022, 11:54:59
Data mod.29 lis 2022, 11:54:59
DostępPubliczny
Aktywnych wyświetleń0